Fraud victim's 18-month fight for £80,000 refund


I really do not like this click bait journalism. £80k was the total amount of which £17k was refunded after a day and £20k after two months.

£43k doesn’t have as nice a ring to it as £80k does it?

How are banks supposed to protect people who give away access to their accounts and money?


The perennial question, but it’s not the story in this case.

A story is exactly what it is. If the article was trimmed down to facts and useful information it would be significantly shorter.